The situation: A CS rep at a sales intelligence platform notices that Marcus T., her VP of Revenue Operations champion at a 600-person logistics software company, hasn’t replied in 19 days. His LinkedIn now shows a new role at a different company. The account is on a $78K annual contract, 4 months from renewal. Last email thread was about an expansion proposal she’d sent.
Output: One likely new owner found and validated. A thin org map that tells a story. A re-entry email that references the expansion proposal — not a cold hello.
Who’s currently at the account (Lusha org map — Revenue Operations function)
| Name | Title | Tenure in role | Flag |
|---|
| Jordan P. | Head of Revenue Operations | 8 months | ⚠ Joined 3 months after Marcus — likely successor or backfill |
| Sienna K. | Revenue Operations Manager | 2.1 years | ✓ Long-tenured, likely has institutional context |
| Dani R. | Sr. RevOps Analyst | 1.4 years | — |
Marcus T. no longer appears in Lusha’s verified contact records for this company. His departure is confirmed.
Primary contact: Jordan P.
- Verified title: Head of Revenue Operations
- Tenure: 8 months at company (joined approx. September 2025)
- Verified work email: j.p@[company].com (confirmed via Lusha)
- Direct mobile: available (masked for privacy)
- LinkedIn overlap with Marcus T.: not detected — likely an external hire, not an internal promotion
Why Jordan: The title and timing fit. Marcus was VP RevOps; Jordan holds the Head title in the same function and joined three months after Marcus departed. Whether Jordan is a direct replacement or a restructured hire, they’re the most senior active person in the function and the most likely to have inherited vendor relationships.
Backup contact: Sienna K. — 2+ years in role, likely has the most institutional knowledge of how the account runs day-to-day. If Jordan doesn’t respond or the relationship was managed operationally rather than strategically, Sienna is the right second touch.
What Gmail shows
Last meaningful exchange: 23 days ago — a reply from Marcus acknowledging receipt of the expansion proposal (adding two new use cases, 18% uplift on current ACV). He said he’d review it with his team by end of that week and come back. He never did.
Open on his side: The expansion proposal review. It was never formally declined or progressed. Open on your side: Nothing — you sent the proposal, he acknowledged it, the next move was his.
One contract detail in the thread: Marcus mentioned in an earlier email that their current contract “auto-renews unless we action it by September.” That’s 4 months away. The new owner likely doesn’t know this clock is running.
Re-entry email (draft)
To: j.p@[company].com Subject: [Your company] account — picking up from where Marcus left off
Hi Jordan,
I’m [Name], your account lead at [Your company]. I saw Marcus has moved on — wanted to reach out before too much time passes.
We were in the middle of a conversation about expanding your current setup — Marcus had an expansion proposal from me that he was reviewing with the team. I don’t want that to go stale or catch you off guard when renewal comes up in September.
Would a quick 15 minutes this week or next make sense — just to introduce ourselves and make sure you have the full picture on where things stand?
[Name]
One risk flag
The expansion proposal is now in a void. Marcus acknowledged it but never circulated it internally before he left. Jordan inherited the account cold — almost certainly without context on the proposal, the September auto-renewal clause, or the pricing discussion. The risk isn’t just that Marcus left. It’s that the account’s key institutional knowledge about this vendor relationship left with him. The re-entry call needs to reconstruct that context before September, not pitch expansion again.
Org map and contact details confirmed via the Lusha connector. Gmail thread summary based on live session. Names and contact details abbreviated for privacy.